Journal of Social Work Values & Ethics

JSWVE is best viewed in Firefox.
Spread Firefox Button

Managing Editor: Association of Social Work Boards

The contents of this website and any publications, advertisements, and other materials contained herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the ASWB and are not to be considered an endorsement or indicator of support for any such publications, advertisements and other materials.  ASWB is a not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) organization whose membership and mission statement can be found at www.aswb.org.     


ISSN: 1553-6947

All pages on this site © White Hat Communications. All rights reserved.


The Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics is indexed in SOCIAL WORK ABSTRACTS, SOCIAL SERVICE ABSTRACTS, INTUTE, JOURNALSEEK, and ACADEMIC SEARCH COMPLETE. It is listed in DOAJ.

 

Choose Language

Who's Online

We have 5 guests online
It It Ethical? 101 Scenarios in Everyday Social Work Practice: A Discussion Workbook











Notice: As of January 1, 2013, the Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics is published by the Association of Social Work Boards at www.jswve.org. This site will remain active as an archive of the journal's editions from 2004-2012. Thank you!

Home arrow SPRING 2006, VOL. 3, #1
SPRING 2006, VOL. 3, #1
Editoral Comment: How Far Do You Go? Print E-mail
Stephen M. Marson & Jerry Finn

Cheating in college!  Literature on the subject is quite distressing and sadly cheating appears to be on the increase.  We suspect that cheating in social work departments is no different than any other areas of study.  We have two particularly terrible examples if academic dishonesty.  

Last Updated ( Friday, 17 March 2006 )
Read more...
 
Letters to the Editors Print E-mail
We received two letters to the editors since the last edition of JSWVE.
Last Updated ( Friday, 17 March 2006 )
Read more...
 
Can We Be Fair? Balancing the Personal with the Professional Response to Terrorism Print E-mail
Denise Ellis, Ph.D., C.S.W., Kean University, Department of Social Work, Union, New Jersey

Abstract

Given the recent terrorism events in the U.S. and the ongoing threat of additional acts, it is imperative that social workers consider the ethical implications that affect the ability to provide for clients, students, and ourselves. This paper examines the role of core values of the NASW Code of Ethics, personal values, fears, safety concerns, limitations, and strengths as social workers practice in the new era of terrorism. 

Last Updated ( Friday, 17 March 2006 )
Read more...
 
Dual Relationship Legitimization and Client Self-Determination Print E-mail
Randy Johner, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Social Work, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

 

Abstract

This paper is a discussion about the legitimization of non-sexual dual relationships in social work practice. Social work ethics and standards require social workers to be cognizant of dual relationships and boundary issues. What happens when the practice arena legitimizes dual relationship actions that ethically do not uphold professional social work standards? What ethical dilemmas does this have for social work practitioners and for their client's right to self-determination? This paper will explore these questions through the utilization of a case study example. Unless the practice arena remains vigilant in monitoring ethical standards of conduct, the helper role will become blurred with personal assumptions about what is right and wrong, and ultimately good.

Last Updated ( Friday, 17 March 2006 )
Read more...
 
Is Self-Determination Still Important? What Experienced Mental Health Social Workers Are Saying Print E-mail
Melissa Floyd Taylor, Ph.D., LCSW, University of North Carolina, Greensboro

 
Abstract 

 
This study investigated the attitudes of 320 seasoned mental health social workers toward the social work value of self-determination. Social workers were asked to rate the importance of self-determination in their daily practice, both as a guiding value and in actual practice and were asked to describe, in relation to their practice history, any changes they had experienced in the importance of the value. The majority of participants responded that they thought more about self-determination now than in the past. Surprisingly, they also reported being relatively untroubled when practice situations conflicted with the value of self-determination, such as when a client was in need of involuntary treatment interventions. Participants provided rich information about why they believed changes had occurred in the way they thought of self-determination and how they implemented self-determination in practice with mental health clients.

Last Updated ( Friday, 17 March 2006 )
Read more...
 
Ethics Complaints in Social Work Practice: A Rural – Urban Comparison Print E-mail

Michael R. Daley, Ph.D., ACSW, University of South Alabama, and Michael O. Doughty, Ph.D., MSSW, Stephen F. Austin State University 

 
Abstract 

A common theme in rural social work is that ethical concerns of confidentiality and dual relationships are greater than in urban communities.  This study compared rural and urban social workers’ reported ethics violations and found complaint profiles for rural and urban social workers to be similar.    

Last Updated ( Friday, 17 March 2006 )
Read more...
 
Ethical Decision-Making Among Hospital Social Workers Print E-mail
Kathleen Boland, Ph.D., LCSW, ACSW, Cedar Crest College

 
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine ethical decision-making among hospital social workers.  The primary intent was to examine the extent to which social workers in health care identify an ethical dilemma, provide a rationale for the basis of their decision, and subsequently follow a process for ethical resolution.  A pattern that emerged was reliance on rules and laws rather then using systematic frameworks.  The findings suggest the need to understand ethical decision-making as part of a thoughtful, ongoing process.

Last Updated ( Friday, 17 March 2006 )
Read more...
 
A Model for Ethical Decision-Making: The Context of Ethics Print E-mail
Bruce D. Hartsell, California State University, Bakersfield

Abstract

This paper presents a model for ethical decision-making that is easy to teach, easy to remember, and easy to use. The model defines life, choice, and relationship as the three elements that comprise the context necessary for an ethical decision to present, and the paper proposes that maximizing each element is the best possible resolution to an ethical dilemma. The model proposes that further resolution of ethical dilemmas is impossible.
Last Updated ( Friday, 17 March 2006 )
Read more...
 












Google
















Joomla Templates by Joomlashack